From Crypto to Equities: How Perpetual Futures Are Evolving

Perpetual futures became one of crypto’s defining market structures for a pretty simple reason: they fit the market they were built for.

Crypto trades continuously. There is no traditional market close, no fixed reopening moment the next morning, and no real concept of “overnight” in the way equity traders think about it.

Perpetual futures evolved within that environment.

Now, the same structure is starting to be applied to assets that have historically behaved very differently, including equities.

That raises a more interesting question than simply what is a perpetual future?

What changes when a market structure designed around continuous trading is applied to an asset class still shaped by opening bells, closing bells and regular trading hours?

This isn’t really a trading-strategy question, it’s more of a market-structure one.

What are perpetual futures

Perpetual futures are similar to traditional futures in that they give traders exposure to the price movement of an asset without requiring ownership of the underlying asset. The main difference is that they don’t expire.

That made them a natural fit for crypto, where markets run 24/7 and traders are used to managing positions continuously rather than around a fixed contract expiry.

Instead of requiring a trader to roll from one contract into another, a perpetual position can remain open for as long as margin requirements are met. That structure became deeply embedded in crypto markets, particularly for assets like BTC and ETH.

So where could the structure go next?

What changes when perpetuals move into equities

Equities come with a different set of conventions. Traditional equity markets have defined trading sessions. There is a regular open and close hours of markets. Earnings are often released outside those hours. News can accumulate overnight. Price discovery is frequently compressed into the next available trading session.

Equity-linked perpetuals introduce a continuously tradable derivative around an asset whose underlying market still follows those traditional hours, creating a few structural and regulatory differences.

The underlying equity itself is not suddenly trading 24/7, the primary market still opens and closes at fixed hours. The perpetual futures markets can continue trading around it.

That means pricing, liquidity and reference data become particularly important outside regular trading hours.

Market hours become part of the product design

This is where equity perpetuals start to look meaningfully different from crypto perpetuals.

For BTC, there is no point in the day where the underlying market simply stops, but for an equity, there is.

That means any continuously traded equity-linked market has to account for periods where the underlying venue is closed, liquidity is thinner, and new information may be arriving without a traditional market immediately repricing around it.

There are different ways venues can approach that problem, and there is unlikely to be one universal model. What matters is recognising that market hours are no longer just an external constraint, they’re part of the design of the product itself.

Why the category may be broadening now

There are a few reasons this structure may be starting to appear beyond crypto.

The first is simply that crypto infrastructure is increasingly being used for assets that were historically confined to traditional financial rails. Tokenised equities, real world assets ("RWAs") and other forms of onchain exposure have made that overlap much more visible.

At the same time, traders who are already comfortable with crypto-native interfaces are increasingly encountering traditional assets through products that look and behave more like the markets they already use.

That does not necessarily mean traditional market structures disappear, it may simply mean the boundaries between the two become less rigid.

A trader could interact with an equity-linked instrument through infrastructure that feels crypto-native, while the underlying reference asset still sits inside a traditional exchange framework.

That hybrid model is still relatively new and constantly evolving.

What does not change

It is easy to overstate what continuous access changes, however some things can remain exactly as important as before.

The underlying equity market still matters during regular trading hours, as liquidity is not uniform across a 24-hour period. Further, corporate actions, trading halts and market-specific rules still have to be accounted for, and an equity perpetual is not the same thing as owning the underlying equity.

Extending the trading window also does not remove market risk. If anything, it introduces additional questions around how price discovery behaves when the underlying market is closed.

What this could mean for market structure

An interesting possibility is that the distinction between “crypto markets” and “traditional markets” becomes less useful over time. Not because the two become identical, they likely won’t, but because some of the market structures developed in crypto may increasingly be applied to other asset classes.

Perpetual futures are one example, continuous trading and onchain settlement are others.

It is still early enough that it would be premature to say exactly where that convergence leads, but it does suggest that crypto-native market structure may not stay confined to crypto.

Closing thought

Perpetuals moving into equities likely won’t make traditional market structure disappear. It will more likely force market participants to rethink some of the assumptions built around it, especially around when markets should be open, how price discovery happens, and what “after hours” really means.

—-

Arcus is a blockchain-based smart contract protocol that permits self-custodial peer-to-peer trading of Stock Tokens, cryptoassets and perpetual futures. Arcus is not a regulated financial services provider, and it is not available in the U.S., Canada, United Kingdom and other restricted jurisdictions.

Stock Tokens are tokenised securities that provide economic exposure to a relevant underlying equity instrument or ETP through a contractual claim against the Issuer for a cash Redemption. Stock Tokens involve risks not present, or not present to the same extent, in traditional stock ownership, including private-key loss or compromise, limited redemption access, liquidity constraints, price or tracking divergences from the underlying, and uncertain or evolving regulatory treatment.

Trading Stock Tokens, cryptoassets or perpetual futures is risky and involves risks of loss, particularly when using leverage. Do your own research.

This content is provided as a general tool for users to learn about or interact with Arcus on their initiative, with no endorsement or recommendation of any trading activities. Users or potential users of this content should not regard it as involving any form of recommendation, invitation or inducement to deal in Stock Tokens, cryptoassets or perpetual futures. Nothing herein should be used as legal, financial, tax, or any other form of advice.

In no event will Pocket Protector Labs Inc. or its affiliates be liable for any loss or damage arising from or in connection with the use of Arcus or this content. By continuing to access this content, you agree to the Interface Terms of Use, Protocol Terms and Privacy Policy.

Market analysis is facilitated with charts by independent third party service provider(s).